Kyle Edmund vs Kimmer Coppejans Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Wojtek Kolan

HEAD TO HEAD

K. Edmund vs K. Coppejans

Kyle Edmund
Kyle Edmund

Flag GBR GBR

l
l
l
w
l
w
w
w
w
l
Kimmer Coppejans
Kimmer Coppejans

Flag BEL BEL

w
l
w
l
l
w
w
w
w
l

0

Win

1

Played

1

Win

30
Age
31
6'2" (188 cm)
Height
5'11" (180 cm)
546
C. Rank
179
14
Best Rank
97
2
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$3.6M
Career Money
$337.8K
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed

Head-to-head: Edmund 0 - 1 Coppejans

They have played 3 sets in total, with Kyle Edmund winning 1 and Kimmer Coppejans winning 2. The last match between Kimmer Coppejans and Kyle Edmund was at the Turin Challenger, 01-05-2015, Round: QF, Surface: Clay, with Kimmer Coppejans getting the victory 6-7(5) 6-3 6-0.

PlayersHead To Head Match Wins
Edmund0
Coppejans1
Last 1 H2H Matches:

(QFTurin Challenger(05-01-15)

Clay
BEL Flag
Kimmer Coppejans
6
6
6
GBR Flag
Kyle Edmund
7
3
0

K. Edmund vs K. Coppejans H2H Profile

Stats
$3,623,010Career Prize Money$337,830
60.60% (366-238)Career Total W/L58.61% (490-346)
0Clay1
15Titles17
0Total H2H Matches1
0% (0-0)YTD Win/Loss0% (0-0)

K. Edmund vs K. Coppejans Match Preview:

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kyle Edmund has won 44.97% of points on their second serve, while Kimmer Coppejans has won 44.89%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kyle Edmund, in recent form, has won 44.16% of their opponent's second serve points, while Kimmer Coppejans has won 48.02%. The same stats for first serve returns are 22.95% and 32.01% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Kyle Edmund has saved 48.67% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kimmer Coppejans has saved 54.43% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Kyle Edmund has won 55.56% of matches played (W/L 15/12), with Kimmer Coppejans winning 69.23% (W/L 63/28) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Kyle Edmund has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 69% (W/L 67/30), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 40% (W/L 20/30). Kimmer Coppejans has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 69% (W/L 146/90), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 25% (W/L 3/9).
  • Player level: In the last year, Kyle Edmund has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 58.82% of matches (W/L 10/7), where as Kimmer Coppejans has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 59.65% of matches (W/L 34/23). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
  • Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Kyle Edmund winning 0 times and Kimmer Coppejans being victorious 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Kyle Edmund winning 1 and Kimmer Coppejans winning 2.
  • The last match between Kyle Edmund and Kimmer Coppejans was at the Turin Challenger, 01-05-2015, Round: QF, Surface: Clay, with Kimmer Coppejans getting the victory 6-7(5) 6-3 6-0.
  • Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:18:7.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kyle Edmund has played against opponents with an average rank of 445.52 while Kimmer Coppejans has played against players with an average rank of 299.65.
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kyle Edmund has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kimmer Coppejans has won 60% in all matches played on tour.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Kyle Edmund has converted 32.00% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kimmer Coppejans has converted 35.86% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Kyle Edmund vs Kimmer Coppejans Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

K. Edmund vs K. Coppejans H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

Stats
0H2H Matches Won1
1Sets Won2
10Games Won18
1Aces (Total)5
0Total Double Faults8
2:18:7Average Match Time2:18:7
64% (54/85)1st Serve %72% (82/114)
54% (29/54)1st Serve Win %67% (55/82)
39% (12/31)2nd Serve Win %38% (12/32)
20% (3/15)Break Pts Won %88% (7/8)
41% (47/114)Return Points Win %52% (44/85)
0% (0/1)Best‑of‑3 Win %100% (1/1)
0% (0/1)Deciding Set Win %100% (1/1)
0% (0/1)1st Set Won, Won Match0% (0/0)
100% (1/1)1st Set Won, Lost Match0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)1st Set Lost, Won Match100% (1/1)

Recent Performance Stats

2nd Serve Win %: Edmund 50%, Coppejans 51%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Edmund 50%, Coppejans 54%.
Break Points Saved %: Edmund 48%, Coppejans 59%.

K. Edmund Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
GrassNottingham 3 Challenger - 07-07-2025

F

GBRJ. Pinnington
L
6-4 7-6(1)

SF

GBRH. Stewart
W
6-1 6-4

QF

GERP. Zahraj
W
7-6(4) 4-3 ret.

R2

GBRL. Broady
W
7-6(1) 6-2

R1

GBRT. Hands
W
6-4 6-4

K. Coppejans Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
HardHersonissos 5 Challenger - 06-10-2025

F

GBRR. Peniston
L
6-3 7-5

SF

CZEH. Barton
W
4-6 7-6(7) 6-3

QF

MDAR. Albot
W
6-4 6-3

R2

GBRT. Samuel
W
6-2 2-6 6-2

R1

LTUE. Butvilas
W
0-6 7-6(5) 6-2
banner

K. Edmund vs K. Coppejans Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

Stats
60.60% (366/238)YTD Win/Loss58.61% (490/346)
59.20% (862/594)Sets Win/Loss55.82% (1113/881)
53.20% (7449/6552)Games Win/Loss52.59% (9833/8865)
56.79% (138/105)Hard Win/Loss61.86% (146/90)
65.89% (141/73)Clay Win/Loss60.60% (323/210)
69.07% (67/30)Indoor Hard W/L32.73% (18/37)
40.00% (20/30)Grass Win/Loss25.00% (3/9)
0.38Aces Per Game0.25
2576Aces Total2274
0.18Double Faults Per Game0.21
1266Total Double Faults1929
1:23:5Average Match Time1:30:4
521.22Average Opponent Rank502.86
59% (21718/36546)1st Serve %64% (32995/51380)
72% (15735/21718)1st Serve Win %67% (22134/32995)
52% (7762/14820)2nd Serve Win %49% (8939/18385)
41% (1379/3358)Break Points Won % (Total)43% (2488/5721)
38% (13833/36405)Return Points Win %42% (22025/52524)
55.17% (32/26)Slam W/L52.86% (37/33)
41.27% (26/37)Masters W/L0.00% (0/1)
58.33% (7/5)Cups W/L33.33% (3/6)
54.29% (76/64)Main Tour W/L27.50% (11/29)
66.86% (117/58)Challenger W/L56.69% (305/233)
69.48% (107/47)Futures W/L75.28% (134/44)
62% (339/543)Best of 3 Sets Win %59% (482/821)
47% (26/55)Best of 5 Sets Win %45% (5/11)
51% (108/212)Tiebreaks Win % (Total)55% (125/226)
47% (84/177)Deciding Set Win %57% (178/312)
84% (379/317)1st Set Won, Won Match84% (455/381)
16% (379/61)1st Set Won, Lost Match16% (455/73)
22% (225/49)1st Set Lost, Won Match28% (381/108)

Other Tennis Predictions Today

03:00 PM 14/10/25
Prediction
FINE. RuusuvuoriPR
FRAG. M. Perricard5
W1
2.64
W2
1.48
04:00 PM 14/10/25
Prediction
ESPJ. B. Cosano
GBRC. Broomq
W1
2.03
W2
1.727
02:10 PM 14/10/25
Prediction
GBRG. Hussey
CZEP. Brunclikq
W1
2.41
W2
1.52
06:00 PM 14/10/25
Prediction
USAS. BanerjeeALT
USAA. Ganesanq
W1
1.125
W2
5.45
12:27 PM 14/10/25
Prediction
ESTD. Glinkaq
FRAC. Taburq
W1
1.666
W2
2.12
02:20 PM 14/10/25
Prediction
SVKA. Molcan
CZEM. GengelALT
W1
1.24
W2
3.75

Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Prediction Of Buyunchaokete Vs Zhizhen H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Buyunchaokete Vs Zhizhen H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Basavareddy Vs Cilic H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Basavareddy Vs Cilic H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Berrettini Vs Svrcina H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Berrettini Vs Svrcina H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Dzumhur Vs Etcheverry H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Dzumhur Vs Etcheverry H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?